A Burger That Changed Everything
There’s a moment in The Founder (the film about Ray Kroc and the early days of McDonald’s) where Kroc takes his first bite of a McDonald’s hamburger and, almost stunned, says something like: this might be the best hamburger I’ve ever had (see YouTube clip: Ray Kroc Visits McDonald's for the First Time | The Founder).
That scene works because it captures what fast, affordable, consistent food meant in that era. Yes, it was a hamburger—but it was also a promise: quick service, a clean operation, and a meal you could trust.
Almost no one talks about a chain burger that way anymore. Today, the common reaction is sameness instead of amazement. Not always “bad,” exactly. Just… interchangeable. Yawn.
Did Ray Kroc actually say that exact line? We looked for a definitive answer and couldn’t find one—and that’s okay. Kroc’s own autobiography describes a customer telling him he’d get “the best hamburger you ever ate” for fifteen cents, and Kroc admits he was impressed once he tried it. Whether the line itself is literal or cinematic, the sentiment clearly belonged to that moment in time.
An Observation Many People Share
Across the country, a quiet consensus has formed: restaurant food doesn’t taste the way it used to.
This is a pattern that has been noticed by people of all ages, in all regions, across nearly every major chain. Pizza tastes the same no matter where it comes from. Casual dining menus feel interchangeable. Even once-reliable comfort foods now arrive lukewarm, overprocessed, or oddly uniform.
Something has changed—and it’s noticeable enough that people are starting to ask why.
A Note on How This Series Began
This series was inspired by a video posted by a widely known influencer—someone with a large following who spends most of their time in the political arena.
- We’re not going to name the video. And we’re not turning this into a political blog.
- What we are going to do is take the core question seriously and examine it in detail.
- Because that’s what we do here. We don’t react—we research.
Is Quality Actually Declining, or Is It Just Perception?
To answer that honestly, we need to separate two different things that often get blurred together:
- Measured change: how restaurants actually source, prep, cook, and serve food.
- Perceived change: how customers feel about quality, value, and whether dining out is still worth the money.
Both matter. And both can be examined.
What the data says about perception
One of the best indicators we have for perception is customer satisfaction tracking. According to the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), satisfaction with full-service restaurants declined in its most recent Restaurant and Food Delivery Study (2025), even as quick-service restaurants held relatively steady.
This doesn’t automatically mean food quality alone declined—satisfaction includes service, pricing, and expectations—but it does confirm something important: customers are experiencing more friction than they used to.
Consumer behavior data tells a similar story. In a national survey/report, YouGov found that a meaningful share of Americans report eating out less often, citing cost and value concerns in Check, please: U.S. Dining Out Report (2025).
People don’t usually change habits without a reason.
So yes—before we even talk about recipes or ingredients, there is measurable evidence of a decline in the restaurant experience as customers perceive it.
What the data says about measured change
On the operational side, the pressure is equally real.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that food-away-from-home prices rose faster than their historical average through 2024. That affects both diners and restaurants—and it changes how food gets made. See: USDA ERS Food Price Outlook: Summary Findings.
The National Restaurant Association tracks the same trend. When menu prices rise faster than traffic, operators look for ways to protect margins. Those responses show up on the plate: simplified menus, standardized ingredients, fewer fresh-prep steps, and more centralized production. See: Menu Prices (Restaurant Economic Insights).
Labor adds another layer. The National Restaurant Association also reports that restaurant labor costs remain elevated compared to historical norms—another force that pushes kitchens toward systems that require less training, less judgment, and less hands-on cooking. See: Restaurant labor costs are well above historical averages.
Put together, the picture becomes clearer. Customers are pulling back because dining out feels less satisfying. At the same time, restaurants are under measurable pressure to operate differently than they once did.
This Series Is About What Can Be Measured
There are plenty of emotional explanations for why restaurant quality feels worse. Some focus on culture. Others point to politics. Still others blame individual workers or executives.
This series takes a narrower—and more useful—approach.
We will focus on factors that can be:
- Observed
- Measured
- Validated across multiple, independent sources
Those factors include:
- Supply-chain consolidation
- Ingredient standardization
- Operational changes inside restaurant kitchens
- Labor structure and training constraints
- Pricing models and cost optimization
- The expanding role of AI and automation
- Shifts in consumer behavior and expectations
No single factor explains everything. But taken together, they tell a story that is both consistent and measurable.
Uniform Ingredients, Uniform Results
One of the clearest measurable shifts in the restaurant industry is consolidation at the ingredient level.
Today, a large share of restaurants—chains and independents alike—source food through a small number of national distributors. These systems offer convenience, predictable pricing, and reliable logistics.
The tradeoff is sameness.
When multiple restaurants buy the same sauces, frozen appetizers, and standardized proteins, flavor differences shrink. When preparation methods also converge, that effect compounds.
From Cooking to Assembly
A second shift has taken place inside restaurant kitchens themselves.
Over the past two decades, many chains have moved away from fresh, on-site preparation and toward:
- Centralized production
- Frozen or par-cooked components
- Reheating and assembly-based workflows
This approach reduces labor complexity and improves consistency across locations. It also changes texture, aroma, and timing—details that matter more to the eating experience than most spreadsheets account for.
Optimization Is Not Neutral
As restaurant groups scaled (an industry term for “grows bigger by copying itself over and over”), many decisions moved away from chefs and managers and toward corporate reporting systems like dashboards. Ever taste a dashboard? No one has—that would be a very bad idea! But dashboards are now running what you taste.
In recent years, those systems increasingly include AI-driven tools designed to optimize:
- Menu profitability
- Ingredient usage
- Prep time
- Waste reduction
- Labor scheduling
Optimization is powerful. But it isn’t neutral: Notice that “taste” and “nutrition” are not on that list.
What a system is told to optimize for matters. When cost, throughput, and predictability become the primary objectives, flavor and experience tend to erode—even if no one explicitly intended that outcome.
This does not mean that AI is the villain: it means AI is an amplifier of existing priorities.
The Consumer’s Role
There is one uncomfortable truth worth acknowledging: These systems persist because they work.
Customers continue to choose food that is faster, cheaper, and familiar—even when quality slips. Over time, expectations adjust. What once felt disappointing becomes normal.
The feedback loop is easy to describe:
- Lower standards reduce risk
- Lower risk encourages standardization
- Standardization reduces variation
- Reduced variation dulls flavor
Breaking that loop requires intentional choices—from restaurants, and from diners.
Where This Series Goes Next
This article sets the foundation.
In the weeks ahead, we’ll examine each of these forces in detail—from supply chains and private equity to labor pressures, AI optimization, and the growing role of home kitchens as a counterbalance.
This is an invitation to understand the systems shaping what we eat—and to decide, deliberately, what we want those systems to value—not a call to abandon restaurants or technology.
Comments