Suits — The Recipe Deposition
Alton Brown fan fiction crossover index
Fictional crossover: This is an original, unofficial work of fan fiction created for entertainment. The characters from Suits, Good Eats, and related programs belong to their respective creators and rights holders.
This fictional story references the Good Eats episode “The Dough Also Rises,” originally broadcast in 1999, and the Food Network video “Cook Southern Biscuits with Alton Brown”.
Cold Open
Interior. Pearson Specter Litt. Harvey’s office. Morning.
HARVEY SPECTER stands behind his desk holding an old index card inside a clear evidence sleeve. The card is stained with flour, grease, and something that may once have been buttermilk.
HARVEY: Flour. Milk. Fat. Bake until done.
MIKE: That is the recipe?
HARVEY: According to our client, it is a trade secret worth eight million dollars.
MIKE: According to that card, it is four words away from being a grocery list.
HARVEY: And according to the complaint, a former production manager stole it, joined a competitor, and duplicated the client’s entire biscuit operation in six weeks.
MIKE: Same recipe?
HARVEY: Same size. Same texture. Same packaging. Same family story on the box.
MIKE: That last part sounds worse than the flour.
HARVEY: The other side says the recipe is public knowledge. They found almost the same ingredients on a bag of self-rising flour.
MIKE: That does not mean the process was public.
HARVEY: Then prove the process mattered.
Harvey places the evidence sleeve in front of Mike.
HARVEY: Deposition is tomorrow.
MIKE: You gave me twenty-four hours?
HARVEY: I gave you twenty-three hours and fifty-eight minutes. You spent two minutes complaining.
Opening titles, accompanied by the imagined sound of a biscuit cutter striking a countertop.
Act One: Mike Remembers Everything
Interior. Conference room. Mike has covered the table with copies of recipes, production manuals, ingredient specifications, and employee training records. RACHEL ZANE enters carrying another file.
RACHEL: I found twelve nearly identical biscuit recipes in public cookbooks, three on flour-company websites, and one handwritten version in a church cookbook from 1974.
MIKE: Ingredients are not enough.
RACHEL: Harvey told you to prove that?
MIKE: Harvey told me to prove the process mattered.
RACHEL: Which means you already think you know how.
MIKE: August 18, 1999.
RACHEL: What happened August 18, 1999?
MIKE: Good Eats. Season one. “The Dough Also Rises.” Alton Brown made Southern biscuits with his grandmother, Mae Skelton. He called her Ma-Mae.
RACHEL: You remember a cooking show from 1999?
MIKE: I watched it the night it aired.
RACHEL: Of course you did.
MIKE: Alton used all-purpose flour and added the leaveners separately. Ma-Mae used self-rising flour. He weighed everything. She spooned flour into a bowl and moved on. He measured the buttermilk. She poured until the dough felt right.
RACHEL: How old were you?
MIKE: Eighteen.
RACHEL: And this seemed important enough to remember forever?
MIKE: Everything seemed important enough to remember forever. That was the problem.
RACHEL: What else happened?
MIKE: Alton explained the chemistry. Ma-Mae finished the biscuits.
RACHEL: That sounds like our case.
MIKE: Exactly.
Mike turns toward the conference-room screen.
MIKE: The ingredients told them what went into the dough. Watching her hands showed how the biscuits were made.
Act Two: The Screening
Interior. Conference room. Later that morning.
HARVEY sits at the head of the table. DONNA PAULSEN stands near the screen. LOUIS LITT enters carrying a legal pad, a laptop, and a silver biscuit cutter sealed inside a plastic bag.
HARVEY: Why is there a biscuit cutter in an evidence bag?
LOUIS: Because chain of custody matters.
HARVEY: It came from the office kitchen.
LOUIS: Which has no sign-out sheet, no sanitation log, and no meaningful system of utensil control.
DONNA: It also has three forks, one spoon, and a note asking people to stop stealing yogurt.
LOUIS: Exactly. Lawlessness.
HARVEY: Mike, tell me why I am watching television instead of preparing for a deposition.
MIKE: Because this is the deposition.
HARVEY: That sentence bought you thirty seconds.
MIKE: Alton Brown and his grandmother made biscuits from similar ingredients using two different systems. He measured and explained everything. She relied on experience, texture, and feel.
LOUIS: Did she twist the cutter?
MIKE: Straight down first. Twist only after the cutter is through the dough.
LOUIS: How close were the biscuits on the pan?
MIKE: Touching.
LOUIS: Oven temperature?
MIKE: The published recipe uses 450 degrees.
LOUIS: Fat?
MIKE: Butter and shortening in Alton’s version. Ma-Mae worked by feel and used self-rising flour.
LOUIS: Play the video.
MIKE: I just gave you the video.
LOUIS: You gave me testimony. I want the exhibit.
HARVEY: For once, he has a point.
Donna starts the clip.
On the screen, ALTON BROWN carefully explains his ingredients and measurements. Beside him, MAE “MA-MAE” SKELTON works efficiently with self-rising flour and years of experience.
The group watches in silence for several seconds.
HARVEY: She is beating him.
MIKE: She knows the process.
LOUIS: He has a scale.
DONNA: She has made biscuits before.
LOUIS: Scales are repeatable.
DONNA: So is practice.
On the screen, Ma-Mae adds buttermilk without measuring and works the dough gently.
HARVEY: How much did she pour?
MIKE: Enough.
HARVEY: That is not a number.
MIKE: It is a decision.
RACHEL: Based on texture.
LOUIS: Texture is subjective.
DONNA: So is your definition of a normal amount of mud.
LOUIS: Mud has standards.
The screen shows Ma-Mae barely patting the dough before cutting the biscuits.
MIKE: There. Minimal handling. Loose dough. No rolling pin.
LOUIS: She is barely touching it.
DONNA: And yet you can see exactly what she is doing.
HARVEY: Mike remembered every word.
DONNA: The case is in her hands.
Everyone turns toward Donna.
DONNA: You are all listening to the recipe. Watch the cook.
Act Three: The Biscuit Liability Matrix
Interior. Pearson Specter Litt kitchen. Afternoon.
Louis has transformed the counter into a biscuit laboratory. Bags of flour stand in labeled rows. Butter is divided into precise cubes. A whiteboard reads: BISCUIT LIABILITY MATRIX.
RACHEL: What is this?
LOUIS: Controlled testing.
RACHEL: In the employee kitchen?
LOUIS: The conference room lacks an oven.
RACHEL: The employee kitchen lacks employees willing to come near it now.
LOUIS: Batch A uses self-rising flour. Batch B uses all-purpose flour with separate leaveners. Batch C uses butter. Batch D uses shortening. Batch E uses both.
RACHEL: You changed more than one variable.
LOUIS: I am testing the entire field of biscuit possibility.
RACHEL: That is not how controlled testing works.
LOUIS: I went to Harvard.
RACHEL: Not for biscuits.
Louis forcefully stirs a bowl of dough.
RACHEL: You are overworking it.
LOUIS: I am ensuring uniformity.
RACHEL: You are ensuring density.
Donna walks in, looks at the bowl, and removes the spoon from Louis’s hand.
DONNA: Step away from the gluten.
LOUIS: Donna, this is privileged work product.
DONNA: This is paste.
Donna begins a second bowl. She mixes only until the dough comes together, turns it onto a lightly floured surface, and folds it gently.
LOUIS: You did not weigh the buttermilk.
DONNA: I watched the video.
LOUIS: Mike watched the video in 1999.
DONNA: Mike remembers information. I watch people.
Louis removes his first tray from the oven. The biscuits are short, pale, and unusually solid.
RACHEL: They look like legal paperweights.
LOUIS: They are structurally sound.
Donna removes her tray. Her biscuits are tall, lightly golden, and touching at the sides.
RACHEL: Same basic ingredients?
DONNA: Close enough.
LOUIS: Then why are yours taller?
DONNA: Because I knew when to stop.
Harvey and Mike enter.
HARVEY: Why does the office smell like breakfast and defeat?
RACHEL: Louis tried to depose the dough.
LOUIS: The dough was evasive.
MIKE: This proves it.
HARVEY: It proves Donna makes better biscuits than Louis.
DONNA: We had that evidence before today.
MIKE: Same category of ingredients. Different handling. Different result. The recipe card cannot explain the product by itself.
HARVEY: Then tomorrow we do not ask what he copied.
MIKE: We ask how he learned to make it.
Act Four: The Recipe Deposition
Interior. Deposition room. The following morning.
Across the table sits CALVIN REESE, the former production manager. His attorney, MARA KENT, arranges a stack of public biscuit recipes in front of him. Harvey sits beside Mike. Rachel organizes exhibits.
MARA: My client has already explained that the recipe is public. Flour, leavening, salt, fat, and buttermilk appear in thousands of recipes.
HARVEY: Then this should be quick.
MARA: That would be refreshing.
HARVEY: Mr. Reese, did you take our client’s recipe card?
REESE: No.
HARVEY: Did you need it?
REESE: I knew how to make biscuits.
HARVEY: That was not my question.
MARA: He answered it.
HARVEY: Then he will have no trouble answering again. Did you need the card?
REESE: No.
HARVEY: Because you had spent six years running the production floor.
REESE: Because the recipe was simple.
HARVEY: Simple enough that your first three commercial test batches failed.
Reese looks toward his attorney.
MARA: Production trials fail.
HARVEY: And then batch four suddenly matched our client’s product.
REESE: We adjusted the formula.
HARVEY: How?
REESE: Less mixing.
HARVEY: That is technique, not formula.
MARA: Every baker knows overmixing makes biscuits tough.
HARVEY: Good. Then let us move past the obvious.
Mike places a production photograph in front of Reese.
MIKE: How wet was the dough when it left the mixer?
REESE: Wet enough.
MIKE: What does that mean?
REESE: It means wet enough to form.
MIKE: Your new company’s written process says the dough should cling to the paddle for two seconds before dropping.
REESE: That is an observation.
MIKE: It is the same observation in our client’s confidential training manual.
MARA: A coincidence.
MIKE: The manual also says to stop the mixer while dry flour remains visible along the outer edge because the final folds will incorporate it.
REESE: That is good practice.
MIKE: Your first three test batches mixed until the flour disappeared. Batch four stopped early. That same week, you accessed our client’s archived training video.
MARA: He was still an employee at the time.
HARVEY: He downloaded it to a personal drive three days before resigning.
Reese shifts in his chair.
MIKE: Who taught you to place the biscuits shoulder to shoulder?
REESE: That is common knowledge.
MIKE: Who taught you to use the center indentation?
REESE: Also common.
MIKE: Who taught you the specific resting interval between cutting and freezing?
REESE: We developed that.
MIKE: In six weeks?
REESE: Yes.
MIKE: The same interval, same humidity adjustment, same cutter pressure, and same batch-temperature limit as the confidential process you supervised for six years?
REESE: There are only so many ways to make a biscuit.
HARVEY: There may be thousands of recipes. You copied one operating system.
MARA: That is rhetoric.
HARVEY: Then let us try evidence.
Rachel places two documents side by side.
HARVEY: Exhibit twelve is our client’s confidential training sheet. Exhibit thirteen is the process Mr. Reese wrote for his new employer. Same unusual sequence. Same internal terms. Same warning about the second pass through the cutter.
MIKE: Even the same misspelling of “lamination.”
REESE: That proves nothing.
MIKE: It proves you did not learn the process from a flour bag.
Silence.
HARVEY: The family did not invent flour, buttermilk, or biscuits. They built a commercial process around generations of technique, documented it, trained employees in it, and kept the operational details confidential.
MARA: What do you want?
HARVEY: Stop using the copied training process. Stop using the family story in your marketing. Return every downloaded file. Pay for the six weeks you tried to turn their history into your launch strategy.
MARA: Eight million dollars?
HARVEY: That was yesterday’s number.
MARA: What changed?
HARVEY: We watched television.
Act Five: The Settlement
Interior. Harvey’s office. Evening.
Harvey pours two drinks. Mike stands near the windows overlooking Manhattan.
MIKE: They agreed to the process restrictions, attribution language, file return, and damages.
HARVEY: They also agreed never to describe their biscuits as “Grandma’s original.”
MIKE: Their marketing team is going to hate that.
HARVEY: Their marketing team should have found a grandmother.
MIKE: The ingredient list was never the secret.
HARVEY: No. The secret was knowing which details mattered.
MIKE: Ma-Mae knew.
HARVEY: Donna knew.
MIKE: Louis almost knew.
HARVEY: Louis made a biscuit capable of surviving discovery.
Donna enters carrying a basket covered with a clean kitchen towel.
DONNA: Settlement biscuits.
HARVEY: Is that a legal category?
DONNA: It is now.
Harvey takes one and breaks it open. Steam rises from the center.
HARVEY: Better than Louis’s.
DONNA: Concrete is better than Louis’s.
MIKE: Same ingredients?
DONNA: Mostly.
MIKE: What did you change?
DONNA: I stopped when the dough was ready.
HARVEY: That is not an answer.
DONNA: It is the only answer that mattered.
Tag Scene: Louis’s Definitive Biscuit
Interior. Louis’s office. Later.
Louis stands before a silver tray holding one perfectly round but suspiciously heavy biscuit. Rachel watches from the doorway.
LOUIS: Batch seventeen.
RACHEL: What happened to batches six through sixteen?
LOUIS: Privileged.
RACHEL: You threw them away.
LOUIS: They were excluded.
Harvey, Mike, and Donna enter.
LOUIS: I have created the legally definitive biscuit. Every variable documented. Every motion standardized. Every ingredient weighed to one-tenth of a gram.
HARVEY: Can we eat it?
LOUIS: After everyone signs the evaluation form.
Harvey breaks off a piece and chews carefully.
HARVEY: It is dry.
LOUIS: It is evidentiary.
MIKE: You worked the dough too long.
LOUIS: I followed the procedure exactly.
DONNA: That was the problem.
Donna takes the biscuit, places it on top of a thick case file, and closes the file securely.
DONNA: Paperweight.
HARVEY: Finally, a use for it.
Freeze frame on Louis’s wounded expression.
Closing thought: A recipe can list every ingredient and still miss the knowledge carried in a cook’s hands. Words preserve the formula. Demonstration preserves the method. Practice connects the two.
Comments